Looks like you're in . Want the local site?
AI VISIBILITY ENGINEERING · UNITED KINGDOM
When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini to recommend a vendor in your category, what comes back? Ignited Nepal audits your entity data, content structure, and knowledge graph presence — then engineers the conditions that get your brand into those answers.
12 LLMs tested per audit. Entity data scored against category competitors. LLMO readiness report delivered in 5 days. Monthly monitoring included.
We are proudly featured on
Trusted by businesses we have shipped growth for
/ This is for you if
First-mover — You want to establish your brand's AI presence before your competitors do. LLMO readiness is still a boardroom-level question in UK enterprise — the brands that move now will own the AI answer layer before it becomes contested ground.
AI-native CMO — Your buyers are early AI adopters. They open ChatGPT or Claude before they open Google. You need your brand to appear accurately — and favourably — in the responses those tools generate.
SaaS or B2B vendor — Your prospects use ChatGPT or Claude to shortlist vendors before they visit your website. If you are not in those shortlists, you are not in the consideration set — regardless of how well your site ranks on Google.
Brand that got it wrong — You searched for your own company in an LLM and got the wrong founding date, the wrong service description, or nothing at all. That is not a data anomaly — it is a structural problem with your entity footprint that requires a deliberate fix.
/ What's broken
LLMs build their understanding of your brand from structured entity data — Wikipedia entries, Wikidata records, schema markup, and consistent citations across authoritative sources. Most UK brands have sparse or absent entity data, so LLMs either misrepresent them or omit them entirely.
LLMs extract facts from content differently to search crawlers. They need clear, factual, self-contained claims — not marketing prose. Most brand websites are written to persuade humans, not to be parsed by AI. That gap means your content is present but not extractable.
If your company is listed as "Ignited Nepal Ltd" in one place, "Ignited Nepal" in another, and "ignitednepal.com" in a third, LLMs may treat these as separate entities — or fail to build a coherent model of your brand at all. Inconsistency across sources is one of the most common and most damaging LLMO problems.
You cannot improve what you do not measure. Most brands have never tested what 12 major LLMs say about them, so they have no baseline from which to track improvement. Without monitoring, you cannot know whether your LLMO work is having any effect.
/ What we engineer
Each workstream is built by the team that audits it, and wired into the rest of your growth system.
A scored review of your entity footprint, content structure, schema markup, and citation signals — tested across 12 LLMs. You receive a written assessment with a prioritised list of gaps and a readiness score benchmarked against your category competitors.
A structured comparison of what LLMs currently know about your brand versus what they should know. The gap report identifies the specific facts, claims, and entity attributes that are missing, wrong, or inconsistently represented across AI systems.
We build or repair your Wikipedia entry, Wikidata record, and on-site schema markup so that LLMs have clean, structured, consistent entity data to draw from. This is the foundation of any sustainable LLMO programme.
Page-by-page recommendations for restructuring your existing content so LLMs can extract accurate, factual claims about your brand. Includes content briefs for new pages designed specifically for LLM extraction.
A branded scorecard that benchmarks your LLMO readiness against up to five category competitors. Delivered as a shareable document suitable for board-level reporting.
We track what 12 LLMs say about your brand every month — measuring accuracy, sentiment, and citation frequency. You receive a monthly report showing whether your entity footprint is improving and where gaps remain.
/ What changes
/ Common questions
Straight answers on scope, timelines and cost. Anything else, ask us directly.
Ask us directlyLLMO readiness is the degree to which a brand's entity data, content structure, and citation signals are prepared for accurate representation in large language model responses. A brand with high LLMO readiness appears correctly and consistently when LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini answer questions about its category, products, or services.
SEO optimises content for search engine ranking algorithms; LLMO optimises entity data and content structure for LLM extraction and citation. The two overlap — structured content and authoritative citations benefit both — but LLMO requires additional work on entity data layers that SEO does not address, including Wikipedia, Wikidata, and structured schema for AI parsing.
We test 12 LLMs as standard: ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Claude (Anthropic), Gemini (Google), Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Grok, Meta AI, and five additional models with significant user bases. The full list is documented in your LLMO Readiness Report.
The LLMO Readiness Report is delivered within five working days of project start. Knowledge gap mapping is completed in week two. Entity data structuring work begins in week two and continues through week four.
The initial LLMO Readiness Assessment starts from £2,500 for UK brands, which includes testing across 12 LLMs, a scored readiness report, and a knowledge gap map. Ongoing monthly LLMO monitoring starts from £800 per month. Entity data structuring and content work are scoped separately based on the gaps identified in the assessment.
You cannot edit LLM outputs directly — they are generated dynamically from training data and retrieval systems. What you can do is change the quality, consistency, and authority of the sources LLMs draw from. When those sources improve, LLM responses improve over subsequent model updates and retrieval cycles.
This varies by LLM. Some systems update via retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and can reflect changes within days or weeks. Others depend on training data refreshes, which may take months. We track improvement across all 12 LLMs monthly and report on what is changing and at what rate.
UK enterprise and B2B sectors are adopting AI tools rapidly. Procurement teams, senior buyers, and board-level decision-makers increasingly use LLMs to evaluate vendors and market categories. LLMO readiness is now a substantive competitive consideration for any UK brand selling into professional or enterprise markets.
Start here
Your competitors are building their AI presence now. The brands that establish accurate, structured entity data in 2026 will hold a compounding advantage in LLM responses for years to come. An LLMO Readiness Assessment tells you exactly where you stand and what to do first.
Ignited Nepal — Growth Engineering Company. Specialists in AI visibility, entity data structuring, and LLMO readiness for UK enterprise and B2B brands.Ignited Nepal
Growth engineering · replies within 1 business day
By continuing you agree to our privacy policy.
