AEO · GEO · LLMO | AI Search Visibility

When AI Answers Replace Search Results, Where Does Your Brand Appear?

AI-generated answers now sit above organic results on Google, Bing, and Perplexity. ChatGPT and Claude respond to millions of purchasing and research queries every day without sending a single click to a website. Ignited Nepal helps UK businesses take control of how they appear — and whether they appear at all — across every AI search environment that matters to their customers.

This is for you if

Who This Is For

B2B service firms — professional services, SaaS, and consultancies watching brand mentions decline in AI-generated industry overviews and looking to reclaim that ground with authority signal-building.

E-commerce and DTC brands — UK retailers whose product recommendations are being shaped by AI assistants that cite competitors because those competitors have stronger entity data and structured content.

Enterprise marketing teams — in-house teams who understand SEO well but find that their existing keyword rankings do not translate into AI answer visibility, and need a disciplined framework for the gap between the two.

Scale-ups entering competitive verticals — growth-stage companies that cannot afford to build brand recognition the slow way, and need AI models to accurately represent what they do, who they serve, and why they matter — from day one.

What's broken

What's Broken

The single-discipline trap is costing UK businesses AI visibility.

Most UK businesses that engage with AI search do so reactively. They add FAQ schema to one page, pitch a few guest posts for citations, or ask their development team to clean up structured data — and then expect results. What they get instead is patchy, inconsistent performance across AI platforms, because AEO, GEO, and LLMO are three distinct disciplines that operate on different signals, different timelines, and different AI systems.

The confusion runs deep.

Many teams treat AEO and GEO as interchangeable terms for the same thing. They are not. AEO is about answering specific questions so that AI engines return your content as the factual response. GEO is about building the citation network that causes AI engines to name your brand when they synthesise broad industry answers. LLMO is about how the underlying language models represent your brand, your products, and your category — a layer that operates largely independently of search queries altogether.

Isolated tactics produce isolated results.

A business that invests heavily in FAQ content (AEO) without building authority citations (GEO) will find its answers cited occasionally but its brand name absent from the broader AI conversations that shape buyer intent. A business that earns third-party citations (GEO) without fixing how language models understand its core offering (LLMO) will be mentioned in AI answers but described inaccurately — which is often worse than not being mentioned at all.

Traditional SEO measurement frameworks do not apply.

Ranking positions, organic traffic volumes, and CTR data do not tell you how often AI systems cite your brand, how accurately they describe you, or how much share of voice you hold in AI-generated category discussions. Without the right measurement infrastructure, UK marketing teams are flying blind in the channel that is growing fastest.

What we engineer

What We Do

Answer Engine Optimisation (AEO)

Answer Engine Optimisation (AEO) focuses on the specific questions your target audience asks AI engines. We map the question landscape around your category, identify the queries where your brand should appear in the AI-generated answer, and build the content architecture and schema markup that makes your content the most credible, citable response. AEO work is precise and question-specific — it requires understanding how AI engines select and attribute direct-answer content, and building pages that satisfy those selection criteria.

Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO)

Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) operates at the level of brand recognition within AI systems. When an AI engine is asked a broad question — "which companies are leading in [category]?" or "what tools do professionals use for [task]?" — it synthesises an answer from the sources it has indexed and the patterns in its training data. GEO is the work of becoming one of those sources: earning citations in high-authority publications, building co-occurrence signals between your brand and the right category terms, and ensuring that the entity data AI engines use to place you in your competitive landscape is complete and accurate.

Large Language Model Optimisation (LLMO)

Large Language Model Optimisation (LLMO) addresses the layer that most businesses miss entirely. Language models hold internal representations of brands, products, and industries that were shaped during training and continue to evolve through their retrieval systems. If an LLM has incomplete, outdated, or inaccurate information about your brand, it will reproduce that inaccuracy at scale — across every platform that uses that model, for every user who asks a relevant question. LLMO fixes this: we audit what LLMs currently know about your brand, identify the gaps and errors, and systematically close them through entity reinforcement, knowledge-optimised content, and structured data signals that LLMs are designed to read.

Common questions

FAQ

What is the difference between AEO, GEO, and LLMO?

AEO, GEO, and LLMO are three distinct disciplines that each address a different layer of how AI systems find, cite, and represent your brand. AEO (Answer Engine Optimisation) targets specific question-and-answer moments — the work involves structuring content so AI engines select it as the response to particular queries. GEO (Generative Engine Optimisation) targets brand recognition in synthesised, multi-source AI answers — it is about building the citation signals and authority patterns that cause AI engines to include your brand when answering broad category questions. LLMO (Large Language Model Optimisation) targets the internal representation of your brand within language models themselves — fixing gaps, errors, and omissions in how LLMs understand and describe your business. They share a goal but operate through different mechanisms and require different tactics.

Which discipline should we start with?

The right starting point depends on your current AI visibility baseline, which is why every engagement begins with an audit. For most UK businesses entering this space, LLMO foundational work is the highest-leverage first investment — if language models hold inaccurate or incomplete data about your brand, AEO and GEO work built on top of that will produce inconsistent results. That said, brands in highly question-driven categories (such as professional services or SaaS) often find that AEO delivers the fastest visible return, while brands competing in crowded markets where AI mentions of competitors are already frequent will prioritise GEO. The audit removes the guesswork.

Do we need all three disciplines, or can we run just one?

Most businesses see meaningful results by starting with one or two disciplines and expanding over time. You do not need all three running simultaneously from day one. What you do need is a clear understanding of how each discipline affects the others — running GEO without LLMO, for example, means that the AI-generated mentions your GEO work earns may describe your brand inaccurately. Running AEO without GEO means your direct answers earn citations but your brand does not accumulate the authority signals that determine whether AI systems recommend you in broader industry discussions. The programme architecture is designed to allow sequenced entry while keeping the longer-term integration in view.

How long does it take to see results?

AEO typically shows measurable citation rate improvements within six to ten weeks of implementation, as AI engines update their index and retrieval systems relatively quickly when high-quality direct-answer content is published. GEO operates on a longer horizon — authority and citation signals accumulate over three to six months before they translate into consistent brand mention share in AI-generated answers. LLMO results are the most variable in timeline because they depend on how frequently the relevant AI models update their knowledge retrieval systems, but entity data improvements typically begin to surface within eight to twelve weeks. A realistic view of the full programme is six months to see all three disciplines performing at a meaningful level.

What does this cost?

AI visibility programmes with Ignited Nepal are priced in GBP and structured based on the number of disciplines in scope, the competitive complexity of the category, and the volume of content and entity work required. Engagements typically begin in the range of £2,500 to £4,500 per month for a focused single-discipline programme, with integrated three-discipline programmes priced from £5,500 per month. The AI Search Audit, which establishes the baseline and prioritisation framework, is priced separately and scoped to the business. Exact pricing is confirmed after the audit.

How does this relate to our existing SEO investment?

AI visibility work does not replace traditional SEO — it extends and strengthens it. The authority signals built through GEO (high-quality editorial citations, structured entity data, topical expertise signals) also reinforce traditional ranking factors. The content architecture built through AEO (clear, well-structured, question-anchored pages) improves organic CTR and dwell time metrics. LLMO work, which involves making content more legible to machine systems, also tends to improve featured snippet capture and structured data performance in traditional search. Businesses that run AI visibility programmes alongside existing SEO typically report that both channels perform more consistently, because the underlying signal quality improves across the board.

Our team

The people behind the work

Not a black box. Real specialists you can call, with their names on the work.

Niraj Raut

Niraj Raut

Founder — Ecommerce SEO
Keshab Joshi

Keshab Joshi

PPC Expert
Hawrry Bhattarai

Hawrry Bhattarai

Google Ads Expert
Arogya Rijal

Arogya Rijal

SaaS SEO Expert
Start here

Your competitors are already appearing in AI answers. Find out where you stand.

Most UK businesses are still treating AI search as a future concern. The ones building AI visibility now are accumulating a citation and authority advantage that will be difficult to close in twelve months' time. An AI Search Audit gives you the baseline data you need to make an informed decision about where to act first.

Run an AI Visibility Audit