LEGAL INTAKE SYSTEMS

US law firm intake conducted over the phone with notes in a legal pad produces inconsistent case screening, missed statute of limitations flags, and client data that cannot be searched — a structured digital intake system fixes all three

Ignited Nepal builds US law firm intake systems connected to Clio, MyCase, and PracticePanther. We automate the intake form, the statute of limitations flag, the conflict check trigger, and the post-intake document collection sequence — so every new matter starts with a complete, searchable, practice-area-specific record.

We are proudly featured on

  • Search Engine Journal
  • Shopify
  • SEO Fomo

Trusted by businesses we have shipped growth for

  • Global IME
  • IME Remit
  • Chandragiri Hills
  • Sublime Trails
  • VEVS
  • Kangaroo
  • Ishan

/ This is for you if

This is for US law firms and solo practitioners who are conducting intake by phone, email, or paper form and losing matter quality and staff time as a result.

Your firm handles personal injury, medical malpractice, immigration, estate planning, criminal defence, or family law

New client intake is conducted by phone with staff taking notes manually and entering data into Clio or another system afterward

Statute of limitations dates are not calculated or flagged at intake for time-sensitive practice areas

Post-intake document collection is managed via email with no automated follow-up if the client does not respond

Intake data flows from a form tool like Typeform or JotForm into a staff member's inbox rather than directly into the practice management system

Your intake quality varies based on which staff member handled the call

If your firm opens more than five new matters per month and your current phone-based intake process adds 20 minutes or more of data entry per matter, the annual cost of that administrative time is already paying for a structured intake system.

/ What's broken

What's Broken

Phone intake with no structured data capture

US law firms conduct initial client intake via phone call with staff taking notes manually on a legal pad or in a free-text notes field. Intake information varies in quality based on who answered the call: experienced intake coordinators ask the right questions, newer staff miss key qualifying information. No standard question set is enforced. No statute of limitations calculation is triggered. No conflict check is initiated automatically. The first client interaction produces inconsistent data that makes every subsequent step — matter assignment, document collection, case strategy — start from a different baseline depending on who took the call.

Statute of limitations not flagged at intake

US personal injury, medical malpractice, products liability, and other time-limited practice areas require staff to collect the client's incident date at intake and calculate whether the matter is within the applicable statute of limitations before the firm invests in case evaluation. Staff currently collect the incident date without an automatic SOL calculation being displayed. Matters that are near or past the SOL filing date are accepted at intake without an urgency flag. The risk is not only accepting a matter that cannot be filed — it is accepting a matter, conducting intake, and then discovering the SOL issue only when the file goes to a senior attorney for review, days or weeks after first contact.

No automated document collection request after intake

US law firm clients complete intake and then receive an email listing the documents they need to provide, often with no follow-up if they do not respond within three to five business days. The matter stalls because the documents needed to evaluate or advance the case are not collected. An automated document request sequence with a 48-hour follow-up, a 96-hour second follow-up, and a staff notification if the client has not responded by day five resolves this without adding to the intake coordinator's daily manual task list.

Intake data not flowing into Clio automatically

US law firm intake is conducted via a separate form tool — Typeform, JotForm, or a web form on the firm's website — with responses emailed to the intake coordinator who manually enters data into Clio or another practice management system. The manual transfer adds 15 to 20 minutes per intake and introduces transcription errors when data is retyped from an email into a form field. A direct integration between the intake form and Clio eliminates the manual transfer step, ensures data is in the correct field, and creates the matter record at the moment the client submits the form.

/ What we engineer

Ignited Nepal builds US law firm intake systems that connect directly to Clio, MyCase, and PracticePanther. We build practice-area-specific intake forms with SOL calculation, conflict check triggers, post-intake document collection sequences, and direct practice management system integration.

Each workstream is built by the team that audits it, and wired into the rest of your growth system.

Practice-area-specific intake forms

We build separate intake forms for each of your practice areas: personal injury (incident date, injury type, involved parties, insurance information), immigration (visa category, country of origin, current status, prior applications), estate planning (asset summary, family structure, existing documents), criminal defence (charge type, jurisdiction, arraignment date, court). Each form collects the information specific to that practice area and nothing else.

Statute of limitations calculation at intake

For personal injury, medical malpractice, products liability, and other time-limited practice areas, we add an SOL calculation to the intake form. When the client enters their incident date, the system calculates the filing deadline under the applicable state statute, displays it to the intake coordinator in the matter record, and flags matters where the deadline is within 90 days, 30 days, or past. The coordinator sees the SOL status before the matter is assigned to an attorney.

Conflict check trigger on matter creation

When the intake form is submitted and a matter is created in Clio or another system, an automated prompt is sent to the intake coordinator or the responsible attorney to run and document the conflict check. The prompt cannot be dismissed without recording the result. The conflict check record is stored in the matter file with a timestamp.

Automated post-intake document collection

Within one hour of intake form submission, the client receives an automated email or SMS specifying the documents they need to provide for their matter type, with a secure upload link. If documents are not uploaded within 48 hours, a follow-up message sends. If no response is received by day five, an internal notification goes to the intake coordinator. The matter record shows a live document collection status.

Direct Clio, MyCase, and PracticePanther integration

We connect intake forms directly to your practice management system via API or automation platform. Matter records are created automatically from intake form submissions. No manual data entry by staff. Intake data is in the correct field in the practice management system from the moment the client submits the form.

/ What changes

What Changes

Before
After
BeforeUS law firms conduct initial client intake via phone call with staff taking notes manually on a legal pad or in a free-text notes field. Intake information varies in quality based on who answered the call: experienced intake coordinators ask the right questions, newer staff miss key qualifying information. No standard question set is enforced. No statute of limitations calculation is triggered. No conflict check is initiated automatically. The first client interaction produces inconsistent data that makes every subsequent step — matter assignment, document collection, case strategy — start from a different baseline depending on who took the call.
AfterA potential client completes a digital intake form specific to their practice area
BeforeUS personal injury, medical malpractice, products liability, and other time-limited practice areas require staff to collect the client's incident date at intake and calculate whether the matter is within the applicable statute of limitations before the firm invests in case evaluation. Staff currently collect the incident date without an automatic SOL calculation being displayed. Matters that are near or past the SOL filing date are accepted at intake without an urgency flag. The risk is not only accepting a matter that cannot be filed — it is accepting a matter, conducting intake, and then discovering the SOL issue only when the file goes to a senior attorney for review, days or weeks after first contact.
AfterThe SOL calculation displays immediately for time-limited matters and flags any matter within 90 days of the filing deadline
BeforeUS law firm clients complete intake and then receive an email listing the documents they need to provide, often with no follow-up if they do not respond within three to five business days. The matter stalls because the documents needed to evaluate or advance the case are not collected. An automated document request sequence with a 48-hour follow-up, a 96-hour second follow-up, and a staff notification if the client has not responded by day five resolves this without adding to the intake coordinator's daily manual task list.
AfterA conflict check prompt is triggered and documented before the matter proceeds
BeforeUS law firm intake is conducted via a separate form tool — Typeform, JotForm, or a web form on the firm's website — with responses emailed to the intake coordinator who manually enters data into Clio or another practice management system. The manual transfer adds 15 to 20 minutes per intake and introduces transcription errors when data is retyped from an email into a form field. A direct integration between the intake form and Clio eliminates the manual transfer step, ensures data is in the correct field, and creates the matter record at the moment the client submits the form.
AfterThe matter record is created in Clio automatically with all intake fields populated

/ How it works

Process

  1. Legal Intake Audit Week 1

    We review your current intake process for each practice area, your existing practice management system configuration, your document collection approach, and your post-intake communication workflow. Output: a written workflow map and a list of the specific intake gaps by practice area.

  2. System Design and Approval Week 1-2

    We design practice-area-specific intake forms, SOL calculation logic, conflict check workflows, document collection sequences, and Clio (or MyCase or PracticePanther) integration. You review and approve the design before build begins.

  3. Build and Integration Week 2-5

    We build the intake forms, connect them to your practice management system, configure the SOL calculation for applicable practice areas, set up the conflict check workflow, and configure the post-intake document collection sequences with TCPA-compliant SMS opt-in for any text-message-based communications.

  4. Testing with Practice Area Scenarios Week 5

    We test the intake flow for each of your practice areas using test matter scenarios. SOL calculations, conflict check prompts, matter creation in Clio, and document collection sequences are all tested before go-live.

  5. Staff Training and Go-Live Week 6

    We train your intake coordinator, paralegals, and attorneys on the new intake workflow, covering what has changed, what is now automatic, and how to handle exceptions and edge cases.

  6. 30-Day Support Weeks 6-10

    We remain available for adjustments, additions, and questions for 30 days post go-live at no additional cost.

/ Common questions

FAQ

Straight answers on scope, timelines and cost. Anything else, ask us directly.

Ask us directly
How do I build a structured digital intake form for a US law firm that flows directly into Clio?

Clio Grow is Clio's native client intake and CRM tool, which supports custom intake forms that create a matter and client record in Clio Manage automatically when submitted. For firms not using Clio Grow, intake forms built in Typeform, JotForm, or a Webflow-based custom form can be connected to Clio Manage via the Clio API or via Zapier and Make automations that map each form field to the corresponding Clio matter field. The Clio API approach is more reliable for firms with high intake volume because it does not depend on a third-party automation platform's uptime. Ignited Nepal builds both setups and handles the field mapping, testing, and ongoing maintenance.

How do I add an automatic statute of limitations calculator to a US personal injury law firm intake form?

A statute of limitations calculator in an intake form works by capturing the incident date as a date field, referencing a lookup table of SOL periods by state and cause of action, calculating the filing deadline, and displaying it to the intake coordinator in the matter record. The SOL lookup table is configured for the states your firm practices in and the cause-of-action types in your practice area — typically two to three years for personal injury depending on state, with specific shorter periods for government entities and specific longer periods for minors. The matter record in Clio shows the SOL deadline prominently, and a flag is added to matters where the deadline is within 90 days. The calculator does not replace attorney review of SOL issues; it ensures that the intake coordinator and the assigning attorney see the filing deadline from the moment the matter is created.

How do I set up an automated document collection sequence after client intake for a US law firm?

An automated document collection sequence is triggered when the intake form is submitted. The sequence sends the client a document request via email and, if the client has consented to SMS contact, via text message. The request specifies the exact documents required for their matter type and includes a secure upload link. A second message sends automatically 48 hours later if documents have not been uploaded. A third message sends at 96 hours. If no documents are received by day five, an internal notification goes to the intake coordinator flagging the matter for follow-up. When all required documents are uploaded, the matter record updates to reflect document collection complete and the matter advances to the next pipeline stage. The upload link is generated per matter and expires after 30 days.

What TCPA compliance does a US law firm need for SMS-based intake reminders?

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act requires that businesses obtain prior written consent before sending automated SMS messages to a consumer's mobile number. For a US law firm, this means the intake form must include an explicit opt-in checkbox for SMS communications — separate from the general terms of engagement — that describes the type of messages the client will receive, the frequency, and how to opt out. The consent record must be stored and timestamped. Messages must include opt-out instructions in each message. A law firm using a platform like Clio Grow, Lawmatics, or HubSpot for SMS intake reminders should verify that the platform stores the consent record in a form that is retrievable if a TCPA complaint is made. Ignited Nepal configures SMS intake sequences with a TCPA-compliant opt-in step as a standard part of the build.

What is the best legal intake software for a US law firm — Clio Grow, Lawmatics, or a custom HubSpot setup?

Clio Grow is the most direct choice for firms already using Clio Manage because it is natively integrated, shares a single data model, and does not require a third-party automation layer to move intake data into the matter management system. Lawmatics is a purpose-built legal CRM designed for law firm intake and client relationship management, with strong automation, drip email, and intake form features; it is a good choice for firms that want more sophisticated intake marketing and follow-up automation than Clio Grow provides. A custom HubSpot setup offers the most flexibility for firms with complex multi-practice-area intake routing, multiple office locations, or the need to integrate intake with broader marketing and referral tracking — but requires more configuration effort and ongoing maintenance than either Clio Grow or Lawmatics. The right choice depends on whether your primary need is a tighter Clio integration, a more marketing-capable intake workflow, or maximum flexibility in routing and reporting.

/ Our team

The people behind the work.

Not a black box. Real specialists you can call, with their names on the work.

About us
Hawrry Bhattarai

Hawrry Bhattarai

Google Ads Expert

Start here

US law firms running phone-based intake with manual data entry into Clio are paying a daily administrative cost — in staff time, in inconsistent case screening, in missed statute of limitations flags, and in matters that stall because document collection has no automated follow-up.

A structured digital intake system built for your specific practice areas, connected directly to your practice management system, and configured for TCPA-compliant SMS communication removes each of these costs. The build takes four to six weeks. The improvement in intake quality and staff efficiency is visible in the first 30 days.