12 min read · Paid Acquisition · Last updated July 2026
Quick answer: Bing Ads reach 35% of US desktop search share with older, higher-income users at CPCs typically 30–40% below Google. The unique advantage no other search platform offers: LinkedIn Profile targeting — targeting searchers by company, job function, and industry directly in search results.
Introduction
Every conversation about Bing Ads starts with the same dismissal: “We already do Google. Why bother?”
Here is why: Microsoft Bing powers 35% of desktop search queries in the United States, processes 12 billion searches per month globally, and its search network extends to Yahoo, AOL, DuckDuckGo, and dozens of partner sites. But the numbers that matter most for your P&L are the cost ones: average CPCs on Bing run 30–40% lower than equivalent Google campaigns, often more in competitive B2B categories where Google CPC inflation has made keyword acquisition genuinely expensive.
And then there is the feature that has no equivalent anywhere else in search advertising: LinkedIn Profile Targeting. Because Microsoft owns LinkedIn, you can target Bing search ads specifically at people who work at companies in your target account list, in specific job functions, or in specific industries — a search intent signal layered with professional identity data. That combination is powerful for B2B and SaaS advertisers.
The full picture: Bing Ads are not a replacement for Google. They are a highly efficient incremental channel that reaches an audience segment underserved by most advertisers — with lower competition, lower costs, and unique targeting capabilities that no other search platform offers.
In this guide you will learn:
– The Bing/Microsoft audience demographics and why they matter for your product
– How to import Google Ads campaigns in one click and what to fix afterwards
– How LinkedIn Profile Targeting works and when to use it
– Microsoft Audience Network and its role in your display strategy
Table of Contents
- Why Bing Ads in 2026: The Underserved Search Channel
- Microsoft Bing Audience Demographics
- Setting Up Microsoft Advertising: Account & Campaign Basics
- Importing from Google Ads: What Transfers, What Doesn’t
- LinkedIn Profile Targeting on Bing
- Microsoft Search Partner Network
- Microsoft Audience Network (Display + Native)
- Automated Bidding on Microsoft Ads
- Microsoft Performance Max
- Negative Keywords Post-Import
- Reporting Differences vs Google
- Google vs Bing CPC Comparison Calculator
- Bing Campaign Import & Setup Checklist
- FAQ
- Conclusion
Why Bing Ads in 2026: The Underserved Search Channel
The commercial case for Bing Ads rests on three pillars:
Pillar 1: Cheaper clicks for the same intent
A user searching “best CRM software for small business” on Bing has the same intent as one searching the same query on Google. But the Bing CPC for that keyword is frequently $4–8 vs $8–15 on Google — because fewer advertisers are competing for it. That’s a 40–50% cost reduction for identical commercial intent. For advertisers spending $20K+/month on Google, even moving 20–30% of that to equivalent Bing campaigns often produces 35–50% more total conversions from the same budget.
Pillar 2: Unique demographic composition
Bing’s user base skews older (45+), more educated, and higher-income than Google’s average. This is not a weakness — it is a targeting advantage for specific product categories:
– Financial services: wealth management, insurance, mortgage products
– B2B/SaaS: decision-makers who use Windows/Edge in enterprise environments
– Healthcare: older demographic health products
– Automotive: higher-income car buyers
– Home improvement: established homeowners with spending power
Pillar 3: LinkedIn Profile Targeting (unique to Microsoft)
No other search advertising platform in the world lets you target search ads by professional identity attributes. This feature alone makes Microsoft Ads mandatory for any serious B2B search advertiser.
Microsoft Bing market share (2026):
– US desktop search: 35%
– Global search: ~10% (mostly concentrated in English-speaking markets)
– Windows-native default: Edge browser default in corporate environments (massive enterprise reach)
– Cortana and Windows Search: integration means Bing queries from Windows devices are significant
– DuckDuckGo and partner network: extends Bing reach to privacy-conscious users
Microsoft Bing Audience Demographics
Bing’s demographic composition is meaningfully different from Google’s, and understanding this shapes your campaign and bid strategy:
Age distribution:
– 18–34: 22% (vs 40%+ on Google)
– 35–49: 31%
– 50–64: 28%
– 65+: 19%
Bing over-indexes heavily in the 45+ demographic. This makes it the dominant search channel for products targeting established professionals and retirees.
Income and education:
– 35% of Bing users have household incomes over $100K
– 49% have college or post-graduate degrees
– Skews toward full-time employed, managerial/professional roles
Device composition:
– Desktop: 70%+ (vs 55% Google). Bing’s desktop dominance comes from being the default in Microsoft Edge and older Internet Explorer environments — heavily represented in corporate and government settings.
– Mobile: 30% (growing but still far below Google’s 65%+ mobile share)
Enterprise/B2B reach:
Windows is dominant in enterprise environments. Employees using corporate Windows devices have Bing/Edge as their default search and browser in many organizations. This is organic B2B reach that Google partially misses.
Practical implications:
– Desktop creative and landing pages matter more on Bing than mobile optimization
– Bid adjustments: increase bids for desktop, decrease for mobile
– Ad scheduling: corporate hours (8am–6pm weekdays) often outperform on Bing vs off-hours
– Ad copy: slightly more formal tone resonates with older demographic
Setting Up Microsoft Advertising: Account & Campaign Basics
Creating a Microsoft Advertising account:
1. Go to ads.microsoft.com → Create account
2. Connect a Microsoft account (personal or business Microsoft 365)
3. Set up billing (credit card, bank account, or prepay)
4. Select your primary market and currency
5. Optionally: link your Google Ads account for import (covered below)
Account structure mirrors Google:
– Account → Campaigns → Ad Groups → Ads/Keywords
Campaign types available:
– Search (keyword-triggered text ads — primary format)
– Shopping (product catalog ads — requires Microsoft Merchant Center)
– Audience (display and native via Microsoft Audience Network)
– Performance Max (Microsoft’s equivalent — launched 2023)
– Video (Bing doesn’t have YouTube-equivalent volume, but video placements exist on partner sites)
First campaign setup recommendations:
– Network: Bing, Yahoo, and AOL Only (exclude “Bing search and syndication” initially — vet partner quality separately)
– Bidding: Manual CPC or Enhanced CPC initially, switch to Target CPA once you have 30+ conversions
– Ad scheduling: weekdays 7am–7pm local time as starting point
– Bid adjustments: +20–30% for desktop; -30% for mobile initially
Importing from Google Ads: What Transfers, What Doesn’t
The one-click Google Ads import is Microsoft Advertising’s most powerful feature for new advertisers. It eliminates 80% of campaign build time.
How to import:
Tools & Settings → Import Campaigns → Import from Google Ads → sign in with Google account → select Google Ads campaigns → configure import options → Start Import.
What transfers successfully:
– Search campaigns (keywords, ad groups, ad structure) ✅
– Expanded text ads (now legacy, but imports) ✅
– Responsive Search Ads (RSAs) ✅
– Call extensions ✅
– Sitelink extensions ✅
– Callout extensions ✅
– Campaign budget settings ✅
– Ad scheduling ✅
– Location targeting ✅
– Keyword match types ✅
– Negative keywords ✅
What does NOT transfer or needs adjustment:
| Element | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| Bidding strategies | Partial | Review — Target CPA/ROAS thresholds may need recalibration |
| Remarketing lists | Does not transfer | Rebuild with UET tag |
| Customer match lists | Does not transfer | Re-upload to Microsoft Ads |
| Google Analytics goals | Does not transfer | Set up UET tag + conversion goals |
| Smart campaigns | Does not transfer | Rebuild manually |
| Discovery campaigns | Does not transfer | Use Audience campaigns |
| YouTube Video campaigns | Does not transfer | Not applicable |
| Image extensions | Does not transfer | Upload manually |
| LinkedIn Profile Targeting | Google does not have this | Add manually after import |
Post-import required actions (in order):
1. Install Universal Event Tracking (UET) tag on website — this is Bing’s equivalent of Google Tag
2. Set up conversion goals in Microsoft Ads (purchase, lead, phone call)
3. Review and lower bids by 20–30% (Bing auction is less competitive — your Google bids will overpay)
4. Add LinkedIn Profile Targeting layers to relevant ad groups
5. Review search term reports after 2 weeks and add negative keywords specific to Bing’s query patterns
Import frequency:
After the initial import, Microsoft Ads allows scheduled recurring imports from Google Ads (daily, weekly, monthly). This keeps your Bing campaigns in sync with Google campaign updates. However, Bing-specific features (LinkedIn targeting, bid adjustments, UET conversions) are not managed in Google and must be updated separately.
LinkedIn Profile Targeting on Bing
This is the feature that makes Microsoft Ads a mandatory channel for B2B advertisers. Because Microsoft owns LinkedIn, Bing can match logged-in LinkedIn users to Bing searchers and apply professional profile attributes to search campaign targeting.
Available LinkedIn Profile dimensions on Bing:
– Company: Target users who work at specific companies (e.g., “Salesforce,” “SAP,” “Deloitte”)
– Job Function: Target by LinkedIn job function categories (same taxonomy as LinkedIn Ads — Marketing, Sales, Finance, IT, etc.)
– Industry: Target by LinkedIn industry classification
How it works in Microsoft Ads:
In your search campaign → Audiences → LinkedIn Profile Targeting → select dimension → search and add targets. You apply bid adjustments rather than strict inclusions — you are modifying bids for searchers who match the LinkedIn attribute, not excluding those who don’t match.
Example applications:
B2B SaaS company selling to HR departments:
– Campaign: HR Software keywords
– LinkedIn Job Function bid adjustment: +30% for Human Resources
– LinkedIn Industry bid adjustment: +20% for companies over 1,000 employees (using Company Size as proxy)
– Effect: HR professionals searching for HR software pay 30% more in auctions → win more impressions from the right audience
Enterprise software company with target account list:
– Campaign: branded + category keywords
– LinkedIn Company targeting: add 200 target companies with +50% bid adjustment
– Effect: when employees of target companies search related keywords, you bid significantly higher → higher impression share for target accounts
Bid adjustment ranges: -90% to +900%. Common practice: use +20% to +50% for primary persona attributes, -20% to -50% for known bad-fit segments.
Limitation: LinkedIn Profile Targeting on Bing is available for all search campaigns, but attribution is limited — Microsoft doesn’t expose individual user data, only aggregate performance by LinkedIn segment in reporting.
Microsoft Search Partner Network
Microsoft’s search partner network extends your search ads beyond Bing.com to:
– Yahoo (Microsoft powers Yahoo search ads)
– AOL / Verizon Media properties
– DuckDuckGo (Bing-powered organic + ads)
– Ecosia (environmental search engine, Bing-powered)
– MSN, Microsoft Edge homepage
– Outlook.com search
– Xbox search
Combined reach: The Microsoft Search Network reaches 95% of online US searchers at some point in the month (including those who primarily use Google) — because DuckDuckGo and Edge have meaningful usage among privacy-conscious and corporate users.
Managing partner network separately:
Segment Bing.com vs Search Partners in reporting to compare performance. Partners often show lower CPCs but also lower conversion rates due to varied query quality. If partner network is underperforming, apply network-level bid adjustments or exclude from specific ad groups.
Microsoft Audience Network (Display + Native)
Microsoft Audience Network (MSAN) delivers display and native ads across Microsoft properties (MSN, Outlook, Bing homepage) and third-party partner sites. It’s Microsoft’s programmatic display offering.
Ad formats:
– Responsive audience ads (similar to Google responsive display — upload headlines, descriptions, images and Microsoft assembles combinations)
– Image-based display ads
– Native ads (appear in content feeds on MSN, etc.)
Targeting options:
– Remarketing (UET tag-based website visitor audiences)
– Customer match (email list upload)
– Lookalike audiences
– In-market audiences
– LinkedIn Profile targeting (available for MSAN too)
– Demographic targeting
MSAN benchmarks:
– CPM: $4–12 (competitive with GDN)
– CTR: 0.05–0.15% (similar to GDN)
– Best use: Retargeting (remarketing) and account-based awareness (LinkedIn targeting layer on display)
When to use MSAN:
MSAN is most effective as a complementary retargeting channel to Search campaigns. Running MSAN remarketing alongside Bing Search creates a multi-touchpoint presence on Microsoft’s ecosystem. It’s not a GDN replacement but a valuable complement if your audience over-indexes on Microsoft properties.
Automated Bidding on Microsoft Ads
Microsoft Ads offers automated bidding strategies that closely mirror Google’s Smart Bidding:
| Microsoft Bidding Strategy | Google Equivalent | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Target CPA | Target CPA | Requires 30+ conversions/month minimum |
| Target ROAS | Target ROAS | Requires 50+ conversions/month |
| Maximize Conversions | Maximize Conversions | Good starting point post-import |
| Maximize Conversion Value | Maximize Conversion Value | Requires revenue values in UET |
| Enhanced CPC | Enhanced CPC | Good first step from manual |
| Manual CPC | Manual CPC | Full control, no automation |
Recommended bidding progression:
1. Start with Enhanced CPC (allows some automation while you build conversion data)
2. Switch to Maximize Conversions once you have 15+ conversions/month
3. Switch to Target CPA once you have 30+ conversions/month at a stable CPA
Important difference from Google: Microsoft’s automated bidding needs roughly the same data thresholds as Google’s Smart Bidding, but the volume is lower on Bing — so these thresholds take longer to reach for lower-budget accounts. Don’t rush to automated bidding without sufficient conversion data; it will underperform manual CPC on thin data.
Microsoft Performance Max
Microsoft Performance Max (PMax) launched in 2023 and reached full parity with Google’s PMax in 2025. It uses AI to serve ads across all Microsoft Advertising inventory: Search, Shopping, Audience (display/native), and partner networks.
Microsoft PMax vs Google PMax:
– Similar structure: asset groups, audience signals, creative assets
– Microsoft PMax can also apply LinkedIn Profile Targeting as an audience signal — a unique advantage over Google PMax
– Reporting depth: Microsoft PMax provides more campaign-level transparency than Google’s PMax in some areas
– Recommended for: ecommerce advertisers with product feeds already running Google Shopping/PMax
For most non-ecommerce advertisers, separate Search + Audience campaigns give more control and transparency than PMax. Use PMax for ecommerce with product feeds; use Search campaigns for service/SaaS/B2B.
Negative Keywords Post-Import
After importing from Google, your negative keyword lists come over — but Bing’s search query patterns differ from Google’s in important ways. Within the first 2 weeks of running your imported campaigns, run a Search Term Report and identify Bing-specific junk traffic that your Google negatives don’t catch.
Common Bing-specific negative keyword issues:
– Bing has a higher proportion of informational queries (users researching, not buying) — add broader informational negatives
– Bing’s match type behavior has historically been slightly broader than Google’s — monitor exact match keyword actual queries carefully
– Partner network searches (Yahoo, DuckDuckGo) may show different query patterns than Bing.com — segment reports separately
Negative keyword maintenance schedule:
– Week 1–2 post-import: daily search term review, aggressive negative additions
– Month 1–3: weekly review
– Ongoing: bi-weekly or monthly review
Build a shared negative keyword list at the account level for common brand-unrelated terms and apply it across all campaigns.
Reporting Differences vs Google
Microsoft Ads reporting closely mirrors Google Ads but with some differences worth noting:
Conversion tracking: Uses UET (Universal Event Tracking) tag instead of Google Tag. UET supports the same events (purchase, lead, page view) but must be installed and configured separately. Conversion import from Google Analytics is not supported — set up native UET conversion goals.
Attribution model: Microsoft Ads supports Last Click, Linear, Time Decay, Position-Based, and Data-Driven attribution models. Data-Driven requires 1,000+ clicks and sufficient conversions to run.
LinkedIn Segment Reporting: Microsoft Ads shows performance broken down by LinkedIn Profile dimensions (Job Function, Industry, Company) in the Dimensions tab. This is unique reporting that gives direct insight into which professional segments are converting.
Search Term Report: More easily accessible in Microsoft Ads than Google (where some terms are hidden under “Other search terms” due to privacy thresholds). Lower-volume accounts on Bing often see more query-level detail.
Cross-device tracking: Microsoft Ads cross-device attribution is available but less robust than Google’s — Microsoft does not have Chrome’s signed-in user advantage for identity resolution.
Google vs Bing CPC Comparison Calculator
Google vs Microsoft Ads CPC & Budget Comparison
Enter your Google Ads CPC and monthly spend to see the projected Bing equivalent and incremental efficiency gain.
Bing Campaign Import & Setup Checklist
Microsoft Ads Launch Checklist
Complete every step before going live. Click to mark done.
FAQ
Q1: Is Bing Ads worth it for small budgets (under $1,000/month)?
Yes, especially for B2B and high-intent categories. At $1,000/month on Bing vs Google, the lower CPCs mean you get 30–40% more clicks for the same spend. For advertisers with $500–2,000/month budgets where Google campaigns are too small to generate meaningful conversion data, Bing can be a better starting channel. However, Bing’s lower volume means it may take longer to accumulate conversion data for automated bidding.
Q2: How accurate is the one-click Google Ads import?
The import is highly accurate for campaign structure, keywords, and ad copy. Where it fails: bidding strategies (require manual recalibration for Bing’s auction dynamics), tracking (UET must be set up separately), remarketing lists (must be rebuilt with UET), and any Google-specific formats or extensions that Bing doesn’t support. Plan 2–4 hours of post-import review for a typical account.
Q3: Does LinkedIn Profile Targeting on Bing increase CPCs?
LinkedIn Profile Targeting applies bid modifiers, not hard inclusions. Increasing your bid for searchers who work in a specific job function means you bid more aggressively for that segment — your effective CPC for those impressions will be higher, but so will the quality and conversion potential of those clicks. Net result is usually a lower CPA for the targeted segment despite higher CPC, because the audience precision improvement outweighs the cost increase.
Q4: How is the Microsoft Audience Network different from the Google Display Network?
MSAN focuses on Microsoft-owned premium properties (MSN, Outlook, Microsoft Edge New Tab) and select partner sites. GDN reaches 90%+ of internet users across millions of websites. MSAN is smaller but tends to show higher-quality inventory — Outlook.com and MSN placements are generally more brand-safe and premium than the long tail of GDN. For B2B retargeting with LinkedIn Profile Targeting layers, MSAN can be more efficient than GDN.
Q5: What should I set as my initial Bing bids after importing from Google?
Reduce imported Google bids by 20–30% immediately after import. Bing’s auction is less competitive, and your Google bids will win too aggressively, overpaying for Bing impressions. After 2 weeks, review your Search Impression Share — if it’s consistently above 85%, you can reduce bids further. If below 50% on high-priority keywords, increase selectively. Use Enhanced CPC rather than Manual CPC to let Microsoft’s algorithm make micro-adjustments within your bid framework.
Conclusion
Microsoft Bing Ads is the most consistently underestimated channel in paid search. A 35% US desktop market share, CPCs 30–40% below Google, an older higher-income audience demographic that over-indexes for B2B and financial products, and a LinkedIn Profile Targeting capability that no other search platform offers — this is not a niche add-on. It’s a systematic efficiency gain that most advertisers are leaving on the table.
The path to entry is low-friction: import your Google campaigns in one click, install the UET tag, calibrate bids down, add LinkedIn targeting for B2B segments, and you’re running within a day. The incremental return on a $1,500–3,000/month Bing investment often exceeds the marginal return on additional Google spend.
If you want Ignited Nepal to set up, optimise, and manage your Microsoft Ads alongside your Google campaigns — with LinkedIn Profile Targeting for B2B accounts and full funnel measurement — we build integrated search programs that extract maximum efficiency from both platforms.
Get a Microsoft Ads Strategy Review → ignitednepal.com/paid-acquisition/
Written by the Ignited Nepal team. ignitednepal.com