Looks like you're in . Want the local site?
Ignited Nepal designs onboarding flows, dashboards, and product screens for SaaS products built in Nepal's growing fintech, edtech, and healthtech ecosystem. If your product was built by engineers and has never had a designer involved, most of your churn is happening before users ever reach the value moment.
You are a SaaS founder in Nepal. Your product was built by your engineering team. It works. Users can complete tasks. But no designer has ever reviewed the onboarding flow, the dashboard layout, or the navigation structure. The product does what it needs to do, and nobody is sure why sign-ups keep dropping off before they do anything.
You have a product team shipping features regularly. The problem is that every feature looks slightly different, uses different patterns, and behaves differently depending on who built it. Users are confused. Support tickets reference UI more than bugs. There is no shared design language across the product.
Users are signing up. The numbers look reasonable. But very few of them reach the point where the product becomes useful to them. You have tried email sequences. You have added tooltips. The drop-off is in the product itself, and fixing the acquisition funnel will not solve a product experience problem.
Most SaaS onboarding flows are designed as a registration sequence, not a value delivery sequence. The user fills in their name, confirms their email, lands on an empty dashboard, and has no idea what to do next. The first value moment, which is the point where the product actually does something useful for the user, is buried two or three steps past where most users give up. Fixing this is not a marketing problem. It is a design problem.
When engineers build dashboards, they display data the way it is stored: tables, lists, IDs, timestamps. When product designers build dashboards, they ask what decision the user is trying to make and present the data in service of that decision. Most SaaS products in early stage have dashboards that reflect the database, not the workflow. Users log in, see a wall of numbers, and do not return.
Each sprint ships something new. The input fields work differently. The modal style changed. The button hierarchy does not match the rest of the app. Over twelve months of shipping, the product accumulates visual and interaction debt that makes new users feel the product is unfinished, even when the underlying functionality is strong.
The product looks fine when it has data. But what does a new user see on their first login when nothing has been set up yet? What happens when an API call fails? What does the system tell the user when they try to do something they do not have permission for? These states are either missing entirely or use raw error strings from the backend. Every one of these moments is a point where a user decides whether the product is trustworthy.
We review your product screen by screen against core usability principles, activation patterns, and interface consistency standards. We document what is broken, what is missing, and what is creating friction for users. For new builds, we replace the audit with a product design brief developed from your user research or business requirements.
We map the full journey a user takes from sign-up to the first value moment, and from the first value moment to a returning, active user. We identify where users drop off, where they get confused, and where the product fails to communicate what to do next. This becomes the foundation for all design decisions that follow.
Before any visual design work, we produce low-fidelity wireframes of every key screen and flow. Wireframes test structure, hierarchy, and logic before any polish is applied. This is where we validate that the flow makes sense with your team and, where possible, with real users.
We produce production-ready screen designs in Figma for every flow covered in the engagement. Every screen is designed at the resolution your product needs, with real content (not placeholder text), real data states, and real edge cases addressed.
We build a component library, token set, and pattern documentation in Figma that your team can use for every future feature. Buttons, inputs, modals, tables, empty states, error states, notifications, and navigation patterns are all documented and consistent. New features can be designed and built without re-inventing anything.
Every screen is annotated with spacing, typography, color values, interaction states, and responsive behavior. We prepare handover files that give your developers everything they need without requiring them to guess at what the design intends. This eliminates the most common cause of design-to-implementation inconsistency.
After your team has built from our designs, we conduct one round of review against the implemented product. We note where the build matches the design and where corrections are needed. This closes the loop and ensures the product your users see matches the product that was designed.
We start with a structured review of your product, your user data, and your business goals. If you have analytics, we review drop-off points. If you have user research, we incorporate it. If you have neither, we work from heuristic review and your team's direct knowledge. By the end of this step, we have a clear picture of what the product needs and a scope of work confirmed with your team.
We map the user journeys we are redesigning and produce wireframes for every flow. You review the wireframes with your team. We revise based on your feedback before moving to high-fidelity design. No visual design work begins until the structure is agreed.
We produce high-fidelity designs in Figma and build the design system in parallel. Every screen is reviewed with your team before handover. We work in shared Figma files so your team has visibility throughout, not just at delivery.
We prepare full developer handover documentation and walk your development team through the files. After implementation, we conduct one review cycle to confirm the build matches the design and note any corrections needed.
Most SaaS products that have been built over time have visual design applied to them, but that is not the same as a product experience designed from the user's perspective. If your onboarding has not been mapped to the first value moment, if your dashboard was built by engineers displaying data rather than designers presenting decisions, and if your design system consists of what accumulated across sprints rather than what was planned, then the product has design applied to it but not designed through it. The difference is visible in your activation and retention numbers.
The earlier product design is applied, the cheaper it is. Redesigning an onboarding flow that has never been designed costs less than redesigning one that has been built, shipped, and had user behavior accumulate on top of it. Small teams with limited engineering capacity benefit most from a design system that makes every future feature faster to build and consistent by default. There is no minimum size requirement. There is a minimum cost to getting it wrong early.
A full engagement covering UX audit, user journeys, wireframes, high-fidelity UI, design system, and developer handover typically runs eight to ten weeks. Scope affects timeline. A single flow redesign, such as onboarding only, can be completed in three to four weeks. We agree scope and timeline at the start of the engagement and do not change it without your approval.
Access to the product, any existing analytics or user research you have, a designated point of contact from your team who can review work and answer product questions, and a rough description of who your users are and what they are trying to accomplish. You do not need to have done any design preparation before contacting us. The audit and discovery phase is designed to gather what we need.
New builds are a portion of our work. For a product that does not yet exist, we replace the UX audit with a product design brief developed from your business requirements, user research, or both. Wireframes, UI design, design system, and developer handover all apply in the same way. The process is the same, just starting from a blank product rather than an existing one.
Not a black box. Real specialists you can call, with their names on the work.
Most SaaS products in Nepal's growing startup ecosystem are built by strong technical teams. The code is solid. The functionality is real. But if no designer has reviewed the onboarding flow, the dashboard, or the navigation architecture, users are hitting friction that costs you activation and retention every day. Ignited Nepal works with SaaS founders and product teams to design the product experience that your users see after they sign up. The work begins with a review of what you have and a clear picture of what needs to change.
Ignited Nepal
Growth engineering · replies within 1 business day
By continuing you agree to our privacy policy.
